Archive for February, 2011
Monday 21 February 2011 @ 3:26 pm
Samantha. asked:
Is there? I mean, me and my friends have been trying to think of a band name, but for right now were thinking ‘All Time High’ like All Time Low. Is that a weird name too, ‘All Time High’?
we live in a small city. not even a city yet just a town, itll be hard. and if we do get big, we’ll change it
oh wait… another thing is i live in Maryland. All TIme Low lives in Maryland too…. hmmmm we’ll never get discovered. but really if we do I bet i’ll have a new name. lol
Is there? I mean, me and my friends have been trying to think of a band name, but for right now were thinking ‘All Time High’ like All Time Low. Is that a weird name too, ‘All Time High’?
we live in a small city. not even a city yet just a town, itll be hard. and if we do get big, we’ll change it
oh wait… another thing is i live in Maryland. All TIme Low lives in Maryland too…. hmmmm we’ll never get discovered. but really if we do I bet i’ll have a new name. lol
Monday 14 February 2011 @ 2:03 pm
Dan Druff asked:
I received five violations in one day because my answers were not really answers. They were answers.
I received five violations in one day because my answers were not really answers. They were answers.
Sunday 13 February 2011 @ 11:10 am
brownsugar asked:
once again how would this world would be if we all can look like we want/desire do you think ppl would put so much emphasis on looks? What would be the biggest question? next too, does looks matter? When can see clearly it doesn’t matter anymore.
once again how would this world would be if we all can look like we want/desire do you think ppl would put so much emphasis on looks? What would be the biggest question? next too, does looks matter? When can see clearly it doesn’t matter anymore.
for example(Im not that old, just using it as an example) color tv was a thing of luxury but soon everyone had/have color tvs it’s no more omg so and so got a color tv. so it wont be a big deals for looks. you think?
Friday 11 February 2011 @ 6:16 pm
Friday 11 February 2011 @ 6:08 pm
Pocket Protectorate asked:
(I’m a smart guy, and I think it’s a pretty fricken good movie as movies go, you know what I mean? Questions, comments, suggestions?
(I’m a smart guy, and I think it’s a pretty fricken good movie as movies go, you know what I mean? Questions, comments, suggestions?
Saturday 5 February 2011 @ 10:48 pm
David C asked:
Why does the left have such a problem with the result of tax cuts resulting in all time high collection of taxes in the late 1980s? Meaning, the laffer curve theory was correct: that charging less in taxes raises intensive to be productive and the end result was more money was paid in taxes than would have been if taxes were raised.
They say it doesn’t work time and time again, but the numbers just don’t lie.
My question was about why the left can’t acknowledge the success of tax cut in the 1980s. There you all go running to Bush and forgetting to mention his grotesque over spending. Well, all I can say is It was a hell of a lot easier to get a job in the Bush years than the Obama years.
Source: The PBS documentary done on Reagan for his 100th birthday.
Why does the left have such a problem with the result of tax cuts resulting in all time high collection of taxes in the late 1980s? Meaning, the laffer curve theory was correct: that charging less in taxes raises intensive to be productive and the end result was more money was paid in taxes than would have been if taxes were raised.
They say it doesn’t work time and time again, but the numbers just don’t lie.
My question was about why the left can’t acknowledge the success of tax cut in the 1980s. There you all go running to Bush and forgetting to mention his grotesque over spending. Well, all I can say is It was a hell of a lot easier to get a job in the Bush years than the Obama years.
Source: The PBS documentary done on Reagan for his 100th birthday.
Wednesday 2 February 2011 @ 10:28 am
Les S asked:
According to Republicans, if we make the rich even more rich, by not allowing them to pay any taxes, they will create tons of jobs and everyone will get more work, increasing tax revenue and so on and so on.
According to Republicans, if we make the rich even more rich, by not allowing them to pay any taxes, they will create tons of jobs and everyone will get more work, increasing tax revenue and so on and so on.
Since the Nixon administration, we have had a Republican conservative ideology of consistently reducing taxes on the rich. The top tax bracket has gone down ever since.
Based on Republican logic, we should have a vibrant super economy where tons of jobs are created because the rich pay less and less.
So why is the poverty rate so high? Taxes on the rich are near historic lows! Why is there mass poverty? Where are the jobs that Republicans consistently promise each time they reduce taxes for the rich?












