Hal Atosis asked:


subdued this country. Not the British or the Russians who allowed no dissent at home and threw whatever they had into the fray.

Drunk Teddy’s Ghost asked:


Ever wonder what would happen to America if it were run by Nancy Pelosi Liberals…?

Where the House, Senate, and White House were all left wing?

Now that we know what a horrendous failure this is, can we please go back this November?

http://www.ibtimes.com/contents/20100916/us-home-foreclosures-on-all-time-high.htm

RALPHIE asked:


It seems like the loudest applausds goes out to anything secular and anything that contradicts moral values .

Obama voter asked:


http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Liberals call me cold and cry that I want to starve the poor children. What about the over 300 million people in America which around 170 million are children? Liberals do you want them to starve when the country goes broke?
Rick dobbs the old welfare is dying but not SSI, Medicaid, WIC, Section 8 and a whole host of myriad entitlements.

You don’t fool me pal I know.

Wyatt C asked:


I need this for a report. Please list reliable sources! All input is welcome.

trovalta_stinks asked:


That every single president since atleast FDR could have said the same thing while he was president?

Every single president could have also said real GDP was at an all time high when he was president. Natural population growth and technological advances that lead to market growth, mean that GDP and tax revenues grow in general with time.

HOWEVER, if you take the percent increase in real GDP from the time a president takes control till the time he leaves, you would see Democrats are indeed better for the economy. FDR, JFK, LBJ, and Clinton outperformed Reagan and Bush Jr in practically every category that I know. But don’t take my word for it. Google online for government historical stats and calculate these percent increases yourselves. You will see I am correct.
Let me add, JFK never cut taxes. It was LBJ who signed the tax cut into law. Plot tax revenues versus time and you will see that tax cut was practically nonexistent. Revenues did not go down AT ALL. By comparison, real tax revenues took huge drops under Reagan and Bush Jr because their tax cuts to the rich were huge.
To the person who said it wasn’t true…

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/sheets/hist01z3.xls

Tax revenues did in fact increase even under Bush Sr.
Unemployment went from 25% when FDR took office to 13% just prior to WWII starting. It went down practically to zero with WWII. The way I see it, FDR’s New Deal programs are atleast partly responsible for the recovery.

Real GDP increased by 88% from 1932 to 1941. That is 88% growth even without war spending. Nobody has ever come close to that kind of growth.

http://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdplev.xls

rainmaker asked:


Canadian Government shows this

ghggj g asked:


is that like 20 this year? have the democrat socialist learned that the tax cuts worked yet?
best economy since reagan. and the dems try to lie. any dem that needs a min wage increase in this economy is too dumb for America.

Tiny Tim asked:


Isn’t the economy performing better than ever- despite
recessions and poverty? What else is it supposed to do,
besides make profits for the corporations?